There have many debates, teachings and lectures on how the life is to be conducted till there is death, and further carrying with the subjects on highlighting the prospects of taking the life in a fastidious demeanour, there has been no acreage, about what is likely to be the resultant, if not wield explicitly, then preta is likely to be the resultant. But lets start with its impute, of how have all these masters and teachings reached to this an abbreviation, that there is death? Does the change of form from one to another, changes in geometrics, signify the deletion of its relevance its attribution being diminished, life is only relevant and existent in the form of the body, the body which in itself is defined as nothing but a construe, of its constituents like cells, tissues muscles, bones, which is atemporal in its being is defining the ethics of the being which is atemporal, is it what all these lectures, debates, spiritual leaders trying to annotate, has any of these orators experienced “death”, have they been laying out the subject as expressed by someone who is “dead”?
Lets try and find out, is there really death, is there a cul-de-sac of the subsumed “unknown”, which is thriving in each and every being, had that been veridical, then how does the described “dead” have hair growth, nail growth for thirteen days after they are ascribed to be “dead”. Had the energy the ardor abandoned the body, what could have resulted in hair growth or nail growth or even body decomposition? Isn’t it worth finding a logics to. As there have been many a apologues many narratives, by the people who were declared “medical dead” but exhilarated present in the form, in which they share, how they were able to see and witness everything, right from their verged form which is existing but not visible to their relatives and other happenings, but there has been no signification of they didn’t existed, ofcourse their being was in different state (which wasn’t matter in its attribution) but nevertheless they were “there.”
The change of form, from the temporal to atemporal, is just a transition state, in which the veridical changes its attribution, and in all the religions and faiths in the world, there is forced evacuation of the energy, when ever the body stops breathing, and canons have adopted the measure of “mourning”, in which the forced ebullience, is given a sent off, by undertaking certain procedures and rituals. This begrudging egress, has led to science of making use of this veridical, by certain types of seers and with specific types of mannerisms, often termed as “tantra” in sanskrit, which led to one more tool of actuating the clandestine vivacity, which is atemporal in its nature but not temporal in its state.
The argumentations, for begrudging egress, probably agnates to abridgement of preserving the dead for that allay, (the time period in which it is yet to fully accept the change in its attribution) due to constrained resources (exceptions of mummies in pyramids, which was only curtailed to the kings and royals), and affordable rituals were incorporated by the seers, to protect the veridical the “unknowable” by undertaking sublime ethics, these ethics generate certain types of vibrations which protects the veridical for being befallen to the seers, who have taken the recourse of using external ardor as tool for cognisance, which is also the reason for family, relatives and friends of the deceased accompany for the last rites, as has been the traditions from the imperial times.
There is no death for the being, its only a transition state, which the ardor takes, but the way the temporal life is conducted should definitely be laying an impression on how and what would be recourse the “unknowable” would be taking. Will it again be subjected to matter or has it attained the stratum, shall remain a mystery till one leaves the “temporal”
No comments:
Post a Comment