The doctor within

The human race is always been struggling with one or another kind of distress, either it may be physical, emotional or physiological, irrespective of the nature, but there has been something which isn’t the way it has to be, either the body by virtue of its various organs or by emotional body which could be suffering huge uncontrolled swings between happiness, grief, and emptiness or physiological body which is generating pulsations which are beyond the control and understanding of the self, but irrespective, of what is the reason, but hardly has been any day with most of the readers, that the day has been the way in the manner as it was meant to be, which is comfortable in its being and existence. The reason for these uncontrolled upsurge and flow of the waves, which has been since the medieval times promoted the thought and the need for humans to explore a respite, may it be in form of medicines, which too have been changing their appearances, from herb and nature based to the synthesised ones, the latter known as the modern or the allopathic medicines, in which the subject the body is exposed to some known and mostly unknown chemicals, to the individual, as the stability of either of above mentioned constituent structures of the human skeleton, is attained or is endeavoured to be accomplished. 

But the author would urge its readers, to think, what is it that take cares of these things, when they are in order or we can rephrase the question, what where is missing which is cause of this sickness or illness, in case it is for the structural body? Or have the readers have heeded to comprehend, if the chemical composition of the medicine is unknown to you, how is it that your body knows what that chemical is and how it is meant to observe it conduct after the induction of that chemical into the body? 

Lets try and explore, what is it that knows all those chemical compositions and also knows how and what to change and to what, after the induction or supply of that chemical, as what is being consumed or administered, is not known to all and everyone, assuming its not only the doctors who would falling sick, a statement made in lighter vein, then how come the body of a medicine subject illiterate also knows how to react with the medicine after its administration to the body? 

The author would abstain, leaving any kind of impression or dictate its readers to obey, but would like to lay certain artefacts and would recluse itself, and let the topic be dribbled by the reader to its conclusion, as what may be best suitable for the reader. As to the doctors, physicians of today or medicinal masters of the past, a certain lag or lacking behaviour within and by the body results, in all and any kind of illness or sickness to be there, which can also be read as, that the body failed to naturally release a certain kind of chemical(s) within, and this lagging of the body to secrete or release that chemical is met by either directly bombarding the body with that specific chemical, as in case with allopathic medicines, or stimulating the body by virtue of herbs, shrubs or other natural constituents, who enact in association with the body, and release the desired chemical for the normal functioning of the body. 

Apart from the above mentioned modes and methods, the author, would also like to take its readers on more primitive way, which is associated with the east, which of lately been also accredited by the west, which makes the fact into “truth”, the method of gemmology, which has been accredited by the concept of “VIBGYOR” and in this like the above mentioned, a external object is placed or worn, which results in stimulating a specific organ or certain mood and the lag of the body to secrete chemically is substituted by external aid. 

Digging deeper into history of the man kind, there is yet another method by which well being is attained, and this method has grasped large volumes in the scriptures of the east, and now the professionals of the west are also accepting its relevance and trying to figure out, more easier ways of how to perform or achieve the results, apart from the disciplines as mentioned in the those scriptures, “The Vedas”, by its method narrates how a body is capable of healing itself by undertaking certain measures. The author, would like to take its readers for de tour and reproach the subject in specific later, there are around 5 million new cells formed everyday in a any human being, and each of this cell is capable enough of taking the uncontrolled way, this process is known as cancer, but the body apart from generating these new cells is also generating a chemical which is keeping the multiplication of these cells in controlled and regulated manner, so that the production of the body is aiding in the well being of the body, not making it sick instead, if we go deeper, even the formation of the new cells is controlled by certain secretion of chemical, which is absent results in absolving of the tissues, which means the body of the person is dissolving by itself, now entering the main subject again, that there are measures as mentioned in the vedas, by which each and every person can achieve well being, provided they are performed in their correct tone and texture. The methodology of hymes called mantras, meditating on the organ which is responsible for the secretion of that chemical along with reciting specific stimulators, are few and summary of how to undergo or endeavour, or approaching the “doctor” within. How ever the author would not like to summarise any further for its to be impressionable, but would appreciate it the readers could earnest by drawing their own logics by this write up.   

Why there is disparity in happiness

There always have been a question, which has been posted to me by my readers and also during the live interactions by my audience towards me, which is, why some people are happy and the others are sad. This question has always been holding the centre stage in each and everyones life, irrespective of where they are, what they do or even to what so ever faith and religion they may associate themselves with, but it always remains the point of concern and gruesome worry for all. Before the author urges its readers to dwell into the reasons of why this is there, the author is hinting for the very existence of this kind of emotion which has led to such a kind of question to come up, which the author would like to resolve with its readers along, is there the reason of absence of certain materialistic things which has led to this thought, or is it with the scarcity of the basic constituents for survival like food, water, which has led most of them struggling with such connotation for their lives, or is it itself, as the question is leading us, that it is in perspective to someone else, a different individual, who according to this questioner, is better equipped or better placed than itself. 

Before trying to explore this so called disparity, with the quantity, quality and the intensity of happiness, lets try and figure out the emotion which is “happiness”, what is it and how is it so relevant and paramount in everyones life, is it a natural product which is there, or is it a synthesised bi product which is formed after, or in other words reaction to some event which has already taken and later this emotion pops up, Is there any natural feeling of happiness, yes, if we may start with a positive and accepting note instead of proving it like a mathematical equation, where the start can be to prove the equation to be wrong. 

Any kind of accomplishment by the self or by someone who is emotionally close to the subject, and also there is some kind of contribution by the subject, then there is a kind of emotion, which can be said to be happiness, which is philosophical way can be said a certain boost to the “ego”, but not undermining the kind of feel generated by associating the emotion of ego onto it, but there is definitely a feel of pleasure, comfort and pride, which is termed as “ happiness”, which if we go by the way this emotion has been there, is by a end result or a bi product of different thing which happened in the past and when the result of that thing was realised and known, then this emotion has come up, which summarises that happiness is not a individual entity but a bi produce of something but more importantly  due to the understanding of the result of the event. Which again takes us to the question, by which the write up started, of how some people have it more and the others have less, and by the summary as just drawn, it means some people have more events happening in their lives and for the others, the carnival of life is having lesser shows, but is it really that way, as in life it is all the same, same number of heart beats per minute same number of breaths, same anatomy, same principles of life and same principles for death too. Which leads the author to engage its reader with a question, in all its sobriety, does your life has lesser occurrence of events in your life than in comparison to the one which is supposedly more happier than the questioner, or is the results of those events which is transcending into?

If the reader is still anxious for the answer, but have reframed the self question, of how and why is there a difference in the results of the events as in comparison to how they manifest for the others, but don’t we sense there is an issue with the manner in which the event has been approached and how it has unfolded as in comparison with the other. Lets take philosophical route of making the thing better understanding, the length of the Dress is dependent upon the availability of the thread, the nature of the thread is defines the dress, like if a silk thread is used then the dress is of silk and same holds true if there is use of cotton thread or any other kind or nature, which makes there is some issue of nature of energy within the individual and its approach, which makes the disparity in the result and also on its bi product, “happiness”. The author refrains from laying any judgement or suggestion which could be impressionable in its being, but would appreciate its reader to think, Wont it better, if the individual approaches the thing, without emphasising on the result instead of laying its emphasis and concentration of the execution of the event, as the author would like to question, if any thing done with concentration of energy yields better results automatically then done recklessly, as driving a car with concentration apart from saving from accidents also saves the car from bumps and enhances the mileage then if the same distance and area is driven recklessly in the same car.  

Attachment : is it really cause of misery

There have been many a teachings by several spiritual leader of how to undermine and overcome the “attachment”, as this is the first thing which is shared by any spiritual leader and is marked as a hinderance towards the scope of attaining solace, and the term “detachment” is introduced in the lives of the people who are either in the form of the audience listening carefully to that lecturer. But there has been carrying forward on this topic and the reasons of attachment aren’t explained, and the process of not being attached to someone with flesh and bones the attachment is diverted to the being, which has not been seen even the orator himself, but the attributions of profitability are articulated which allure the individual or the conglomerate of the assembled ones, which means the attachment is not taken off, just with whom it is, gets changed, as the dissecting brain of the human, feels better profitability of having those emotions with “GOD” or the lecturer than the individual who was holding the post earlier.

But, the person the individual had gone there for the eradication of the problem, which is there for the reasons unknown to the individual itself, but by the laying of the words as expressed by the lecturer, the point of agreeing is attained, that all what is wrong is due to attachment and this attachment is the cause of all the miseries and despair which is occurring in the life of specific individual or in general with the conglomerate. There has no mention, to make the audience realise why did they, in each of the their specific lives, reach to the emotion termed as attachment, there is no explanation as laid which would explicitly show the reasons, but the target of attachment is changed, which in some physiological weaker people, tends to strike. The author doesn’t undermines the relevance of adopting “bhakti” as a tool of stimulating the hidden energies, but would definitely submit, is it a real solution, as the weakness or vulnerability, would remain, till the time there is cure for it or at least the reasons become clearer for this kind of emotion to be there. 

The author would not like to state any reason, which may try to impress upon the thoughts of its readers, but would definitely ask its readers to see, what can be the probables of having any attachment. Lets try and dig into the reasons of why there is attachment or what is start point of this emotion to get introduced into the lives of the humans and how and where this measure is adopted, of course in unsaid manner, but is adopted. The child who has no understanding of any relation, an infant who is adolescent, and has no idea about who’s who and their importance or relevance in his/her life, but knows how to react and act when the mother of the child extends herself for him/her to feed and satisfy the hunger, this process stretches to the times when the child showers smile towards the person by recognising it by face and odour, which is the start of first attachment, of the child towards anyone apart from his/her survival needs. Lets explore this episode first before taking more complex ones, the reason for the child shall not be understood there is sudden spurge of emotions of divine love or something similar, but even the child who is adolescent in all other worldly measure and etiquettes, but is aware, that this person provides me comfort which I am unable to have on my own, this very genesis of having some kind of comfort, which is not possible by oneself, is the reasons for all other associations followed by attachments which happen in the lives of each and every individual. The sense of security, which may be either in the form of family, friend, spouse, children and even identification with the country (especially when you are in the foreign land, and you happen to come across a fellow countrymen), are probables of attachments, the feel of vacuum or discomfort within the individual is the primary reason for the individual to reflect the emotion of attachment towards the other, and when this attachment is not reciprocated in and with the same frequency, a certain kind of discomfort or friction evolves, as your need to have the association is sufficed by having a certain person, but that person can be languishing for some other kind of comfort which may not be possible in your capabilities, thats when there is unrest in the association which leads to the thoughts of terminating that one and making another one, which due to socio economic reasons may not be possible, and rift widens, disturbing the already perturbed beings further. The reasons of providing cash, share in property and cut in the earnings for the divorced wife, has been marked in all the faiths and religions, and now in the west the child can also seek divorce from its parents with the economic assurance as guaranteed by the law of that country. This all has been done, to have end to the associations who aren’t fulfilling each others needs, and hence there is no “attachment”amongst two individuals, most individual adopt of having humans as company to over come loneliness, the others adopt other measures, like adopting a pet, child , watching movie or even to taking recourse with drugs, which would take them away from the feeling of loneliness, this loneliness in specific, can occur even a crowd, when there is none who is kind of familiar or accepting. The author doesn’t intends to hint, even minutely that there is something wrong in having these or any kind of associations, but the thing which definitely deserves your attention is, total dependence on any association, may it be for work specific or emotion specific, and that too when the openess of discovery of oneself in context to the other participant, is it there, is there the value of truth the scope or opportunity to realise the lacking and are there are measures undertaken to overcome them and the author would recluse itself on triggering any impressionable synthesis, but is trying to engage its reader to think, is it possible to live in isolation, is isolation a contemporary to solace? But one really needs to understand, the scope and provisions of having associations for weaknesses, or would it be better to overcome the weakness instead of creating another for taking care which would still be existing? As the seers of the primitive world lived in mostly in isolation, but were there to stay rules and systems for the societies to follow.

The author, would earnestness its readers to introspect wisely and truly, the reasons of having any attachment with anyone, doesn’t the need for security or comfort or company, are the landing grounds on which the questions rests? 

God a human creation

The very utterance or remembrance of the term “GOD” would give semblance of some sculptor or place of worship to a significant number and the others would don’t identify with either the sculptor or defined place of worship would have a different image associating with it, but in both the cases, it would definitely be doing with a thing which is in space and time arena. Lets kick off the debate with a set question, if god be a thing which in itself is bound by the space and time factors, and these both of them combined form only .01% of the entire cosmos, then who would taking care or making the things happen in the other part which isn’t in time and space, and mind it, it is 99.99% to which the author is trying its readers attention to. If GOD is as what is being marketed, well, by the spiritual leaders and the factory people who tend to be manufacturing the smaller replicas in the form of idols, and it denotes the ultimate, then what is that thing which made that “GOD” take the form of the human, who gave birth to that “GOD” and how is it, which is Ultimate in itself died. Well there may be pleasing notions to it, that the “GOD” left his/her body and went, which leads to another question, where did the “GOD” leave for? 

The concept of “GOD” as like many other things, is a gift of the west to the world, as before this concept was injected and people somehow followed it, there were concepts of “AATMAN” which is beyond the concepts of space and time, which is there, but still its existence can neither be seen, felt or explored, but there was no contest for it being there. The concepts of “GOD” came with the discrepancies in the evolving societies, and as the law of the nature is, the powerful ones prevailed. In the ancient civilisations, first came the concept, of preaching or performing certain sacred rituals on name of the powerful leaders (oftenly kings or elderly of the family), and then the concept of making their idols was floated, which somehow clicked with the imaginations of the societies, which then existed, and later it transcended into recycled information from one generation to another. As if we take up a example, just of the sake of making the things easier for the reader, there were hardly any cameras, when the leaders of the newer religions were dwelling on the face of the earth, but to make a better impact and reach to the larger audience, a appealing and appalling sculptors were sculpted, so that the target of the prayers and hymes were in visibility and the person offering the prayers could easily correlate with the “GOD” who of course was in the human form, and is the ultimate one and the path ascribed and described, is the only one, and its adoption would lead to the ultimate glory, of course the add ons of giving wealth, beauty and other physical and phycological needs were not left out either, the concept was no different, as to what we get to hear and know, if any health product is introduced to the shelf. 

The concepts of introducing the sculptors in the system, was to assist the preacher to have something to focus upon, as in most of the cases, there is lack of focus, which leads to people hovering over from one leader to another and to another. This concept is quite similar to lighting up a candle and focusing on it, so that mind which is not in the control of the individual has something to do, but unfortunately, this tool which was initially designed and placed as a medium has itself been taken as the destination, which has taken the preacher assume and believe that the sculptor is the one, and it takes away any feel of the explorations, which incur. 

The author, is in no way against any concept, and against any procedure, but would urge its reader to really give a thought, if the one as being represented in the sculptor is true, who was taking care of the people who existed before this figure was born, and how can that die in pain and agony, which is promising to provide you with all the luxuries? wont it be appropriate, for the reader to have a logical understanding, instead of just be blind follower of the things, which the reader ( the author is certain about it) wouldn’t have experienced or felt, but the stories of some unknown are definitely there in the offerings. 

The cabalistic mystery

Most of the readers, or seriously most of them, would have been feeling of friction within themselves, for reasons unknown, in most of the times, and wrongly understood during the other, but would be feeling a kind of dissatisfaction within themselves, something somewhere within, isn’t too happy, before reaching to how to make it happy wont it be wiser, to know, who and what it is that is ceasing all the other emotions and acting so paramount, that everything else seems to be loosing its space, sense and logics to it, has there been a real thought, into it. As there has to be an understanding of what it is that, has messed up the entire life, entire being and its basic ethos, and why would you be caring so much so about it, that nothing seems to be impressing it, and you being the master of your being is acting as a slave to the thing, which is there in you, but is making you follow its admonitions and behaving as bounded and unappreciated labour. What is it, which is trying to hold the saddle and make you work as it wants, if you feel its your wishes or hopes, who are reasons for that, please step back a little, and think again, these aspirations are or were built upon something, which laid the grounds, for them to dwell, which summaries, that these aspirations and greed is a bi product of the thing, which is cabalistic, but whose symbiosis isn’t cognizant, but is being endured, by each and everyone. This commutation, does seems to be scary, as there is something which is driving everything is the causation of each and every apathy, sorrow, grief but is cabalistic in its being?

Lets veraciously, try and find the antecedent, as the author refrains from laying any impression on the mind of its readers and would not like the readers to blindly approbate, about that thing which has been causing all the turmoil, and making the individual work all around to satisfy it and impress it and still is cabalistic inspire being so prudent in the existence and emotional relevance of that individual in specific and everyone is general. The author is quite certain, that its readers would have dissected, and would have reached a antiphon, about what it has been that has been responsible for all this misery, the antiphons, would be varying from the following of the faith, religion and superstitions, which the readers would be following, right from greed, lust to the blaming the almighty with the placement of planets and past and present karmas, are expected to the answers which the author anticipates to arrogate, but very humbly, would request my readers what is ethos on which you have based your antiphons upon, recycled informations, based upon teachings or lectures from the anticipated spiritual masters? As it would be interesting to know, how many of the readers would have really experienced all or any of the above, in person. Isn’t it just passed on information, an understanding which has been well articulated and which has been existing from the immemorial able times, and had these been true, the author seems quite certain, there would have been seers who would have sorted this out too, as has been the case with other things, like developing society, just to quote as an example, but this seems to be existed then too and is even relevant now. 

The forefathers had been successful in carving out things for the next generation, like laying discovering and inventing things which have contributed in ease of life for the present generation than the previous ones, as this venture was undertaken by a holistic measure, of all then existing being languishing for the betterment, but this riddle remained unsolved for most of them then, and is sadly a unsolved and puzzlement today too. What is it, which drove those previous generations to work upon, for changing the landscapes of the then existing societies, which have evolved into the present one, wasn’t there a kind of despair, which was triggering all this metaphors. 

The author, instead of acting or behaving as icebreaker and coming with any kind of solution as the world is already beaming with so many leaders, who have ready answers to all the questions, but somehow in most the cases, the answers which they are propagating don’t seem to be working even for them, leading them to travel and take marketing strategy as refuge, for deeper reach, which in itself is a reflection, the quest for name, fame and money isn’t done with them either, so the author abstains to scribble anything which may sound to be solution of the existence and reasons for the cosmos to be there and also it may not be comprehensive for all the readers would just sign off this write up, with the food for thought, what is it that it triggering all problems, all the greed, lust and dissimilarity even while dealing with the basics of life, as the world had and is in such a heterogeneous form, where all the things are together but somehow not blending well to form into one product.  

Death: Reality or Myht

There have many debates, teachings and lectures on how the life is to be conducted till there is death, and further carrying with the subjects on highlighting the prospects of taking the life in a fastidious demeanour, there has been no acreage, about what is likely to be the resultant, if not wield explicitly, then preta is likely to be the resultant. But lets start with its impute, of how have all these masters and teachings reached to this an abbreviation, that there is death? Does the change of form from one to another, changes in geometrics, signify the deletion of its relevance its attribution being diminished, life is only relevant and existent in the form of the body, the body which in itself is defined as nothing but a construe, of its constituents like cells, tissues muscles, bones, which is atemporal in its being is defining the ethics of the being which is atemporal, is it what all these lectures, debates, spiritual leaders trying to annotate, has any of these orators experienced “death”, have they been laying out the subject as expressed by someone who is “dead”? 

Lets try and find out, is there really death, is there a cul-de-sac of the subsumed “unknown”, which is thriving in each and every being, had that been veridical, then how does the described “dead” have hair growth, nail growth for thirteen days after they are ascribed to be “dead”. Had the energy the ardor abandoned the body, what could have resulted in hair growth or nail growth or even body decomposition? Isn’t it worth finding a logics to. As there have been many a apologues many narratives, by the people who were declared “medical dead” but exhilarated present in the form, in which they share, how they were able to see and witness everything, right from their verged form which is existing but not visible to their relatives and other happenings, but there has been no signification of they didn’t existed, ofcourse their being was in different state (which wasn’t matter in its attribution) but nevertheless they were “there.” 

The change of form, from the temporal to atemporal, is just a transition state, in which the veridical changes its attribution, and in all the religions and faiths in the world, there is forced evacuation of the energy, when ever the body stops breathing, and canons have adopted the measure of “mourning”, in which the forced ebullience, is given a sent off, by undertaking certain procedures and rituals. This begrudging egress, has led to science of making use of this veridical, by certain types of seers and with specific types of mannerisms, often termed as “tantra” in sanskrit, which led to one more tool of actuating the clandestine vivacity, which is atemporal in its nature but not temporal in its state.

The argumentations, for begrudging egress, probably agnates to abridgement of preserving the dead for that allay, (the time period in which it is yet to fully accept the change in its attribution) due to constrained resources (exceptions of mummies in pyramids, which was only curtailed to the kings and royals), and affordable rituals were incorporated by the seers, to protect the veridical the “unknowable” by undertaking sublime ethics, these ethics generate certain types of vibrations which protects the veridical for being befallen to the seers, who have taken the recourse of using external ardor as tool for cognisance, which is also the reason for family, relatives and friends of the deceased accompany for the last rites, as has been the traditions from the imperial times. 

There is no death for the being, its only a transition state, which the ardor takes, but the way the temporal life is conducted should definitely be laying an impression on how and what would be recourse the “unknowable” would be taking. Will it again be subjected to matter or has it attained the stratum, shall remain a mystery till one leaves the “temporal”  

The undefined concepts

Does earnestness shows seriousness about the contents of life, is it really the thing which most or rather all of us are to seek. What is it that we really want in our lives, which has led to this restlessness in the lives which most of the people want? Is there a discovery which we want to have? Prudent in most of the people there is quest for some kind of peace some kind happiness, which is in the want in the quest in lives, when there is so much turmoil in the lives and the world. The quest for this happiness or ease has led most of the people wander by adopting one or another kind of measure as refuge, to have some easiness in their lives, but this quest, seems to be unending, a journey which has led to more confusions as to what I have is it real is it impeccable or it is just the passing syndrome, alikes keep daunting the mind and the body, in most of the people who are languishing to have some solace in their lives, and in case for the ones who don’t wander for peace are just living for the sake of it. 

The quest doesn’t even remains in the ambit of the religion, spiritual leader or faith, it keeps hovering from one to another to another and so on, which gives birth to a question, what is it that most of the people want to derive, is it the search of happiness or is it the gratification, and is this happiness a after product of this gratification. This enjambment of the razzle-dazzle, often leads the person just occupied, not doesn’t really enlightens the path or either gratification or happiness, but there seems to evasiveness of “self” during this entire exercise of both, the thought and the body, which does emits the emotions of “something”,which is not clear but yeah “something” being added to cart, irrespective of its value to the communicating impressions to life or its conduct, but there is definitely something added to the basket, as if the atemporal is a stratified object with temporal mannerisms. 

As per the author, there is a difference between gratification and happiness, the life leads many paths to have the sense of gratification but happiness happens to diabolic, its a bi product of something else, which in itself isn’t know, till it really is there (like butter in the milk cant be seen but there is no contest to its existence in milk), but unfortunately, most of the people who go shopping for it (from one place to another, from one spiritual leader to another swinging from one religion one faith to another) aren’t very certain of what they intend, is it gratification or happiness. The earnest approach towards the desired product is not there as the product in itself lies in the confused state and is not known, and by following the path of language, both are assumed to be same, and in most of the case the quest is only for fullness. 

People gather in a hall and listen to lecturer and then to another, as there is a search for something which isn’t there, a kind of vacuum, but to know what has caused this vacuum, is the question for which has led many or most of the people to move from one to another and to another. There can be no ratification, till the time, the product, which most of us want, is clear, else what else can be the reason for most of the people running and adopting and then abandoning, one measure, either spiritual leader or religious place or faith or profoundly going through the scriptures or books authored by someone else. Lets pose a question, is the longing clear of what is wanted, is it gratification of solace, which amongst them is it which is wanted. All the search can be futile and in vain, till the time there is crystallisation of “what” is it that is wanted the thing which is desired, is it life which is to be synthesised or is it something which belong the periphery of breath? 

In all the cases, whether its the physical endeavour of visiting some spiritual leader or following the ethics of any adopted religion or faith, the minutes as communicated remain, how to forgo the lust and want of things, how to change the systematics of life, and also how to study oneself, which leads to a question, what is to be studied, which makes the individual, “you”which in itself is not order and in itself is transmitting untarget energies, in the form of thoughts and despair. How can the thing, the individual, who is not in order as in regard the alignment of energies and even in quest and thoughts isn’t certain about what is it, which is wanted and what is to be had, in perspective of life and beyond, can find the right answer and have figure the rightful thing when there is mayhem and anarchy about “what is it that is wanted”, is it gratification which is beyond the worldly things and is not at all related to having money fame wealth and so on and so forth or is it happiness which too in itself is an individual characteristic, and is void of having any reasons and logics for its being. If there be no gratification and happiness, in attaining all the money, fame and wealth and they are just a nomadic or basic traits, for sustaining life, then why is it, gratification and happiness are tend to be sorted out as a bi product of them, isn’t not having the things which you desire not resulting even after them the failure, is the reason for all the despair which is making most of you, wander, as if in a desert and follow the oasis, which is really not there. It is not that its only “you” who has failed to have gratification and happiness, from money, but there have been “n” number of people who had come and left, just by leading the life of a wrangler. 

In the next write up, we shall try and understand the need of “God”, whether its for worldly pleasures or something, about which all have an idea, but really don’t know, what it is. The thing which is beyond the ambit of being a “thing” but still, to have which isn’t really in “thing” classification.